VictimsOutReach

Spiritual Abuse

Spiritual Abuse

SpiritualAbuse

 

by David Henke

Founding Date: Spiritual abuse is as old as false religion itself. While the practice is old, the term "spiritual abuse" may have been coined first by Jeff VanVonderen.

Organizational Structure: Can occur under virtually any organizational structure, but "top down" hierarchical structures are especially well suited to systemic spiritual abuse.

DEFINED

Spiritual abuse is the misuse of a position of power, leadership, or influence to further the selfish interests of someone other than the individual who needs help. Sometimes abuse arises out of a doctrinal position. At other times it occurs because of legitimate personal needs of a leader that are being met by illegitimate means. Spiritually abusive religious systems are sometimes described as legalistic, mind controlling, religiously addictive, and authoritarian.

COMMON CHARACTERISTICS

#1) Authoritarian

The most distinctive characteristic of a spiritually abusive religious system, or leader, is the over-emphasis on authority. Because a group claims to have been established by God Himself the leaders in this system claim the right to command their followers.

This authority supposedly comes from the position they occupy. In Matthew 23:1-2 Jesus said the Scribes and Pharisees "sit in Moses' seat," a position of spiritual authority. Many names are used but in the abusive system this is a position of power, not moral authority. The assumption is that God operates among His people through a hierarchy, or "chain of command." In this abusive system unconditional submission is often called a "covering," or "umbrella of protection" which will provide some spiritual blessing to those who fully submit. Followers may be told that God will bless their submission even if the leadship is wrong. It is not their place to judge or correct the leadership - God will see to that.

#2) Image Conscious

The abusive religious system is scrupulous to maintain an image of righteousness. The organization's history is often misrepresented in the effort to demonstrate the organization's special relationship to God. The mistaken judgements and character flaws of its leaders are denied or covered up in order to validate their authority. Impossibly high legalistic standards of thought and behavior may be imposed on the members. Their failure to live up to these standards is a constant reminder of the follower's inferiority to his leaders, and the necessity of submission to them. Abusive religion is, at heart, legalism.

Abusive religion is also paranoid. Because the truth about the abusive religious system would be quickly rejected if recognized, outsiders are shown only a positive image of the group. This is rationalized by assuming that the religion would not be understood by "worldly" people; therefore they have no right to know. This attitude leads to members being secretive about some doctrines and the inner policies and proceedures of the group. Leaders, especially, will keep secrets from their members. This secrecy is rooted in a basic distrust of others because the belief system is false and can not stand scrutiny.

#3) Suppresses Criticism

Because the religious system is not based on the truth it cannot allow questions, dissent, or open discussions about issues. The person who dissents becomes the problem rather than the issue he raised. The truth about any issue is settled and handed down from the top of the hierarchy. Questioning anything is considered a challenge to authority. Thinking for oneself is suppressed by pointing out that it leads to doubts. This is portrayed as unbelief in God and His anointed leaders. Thus the follower controls his own thoughts by fear of doubting God.

#4) Perfectionistic

A most natural assumption is that a person does not get something for nothing. Apart from the express declarations of salvation by grace through faith God has given in the scriptures, it would be natural to think that one must earn salvation, or at least work to keep it. Thus, in abusive religions all blessings come through performance of spiritual requirements. Failure is strongly condemned so there is only one alternative, perfection. So long as he thinks he is succeeding in his observation of the rules, the follower typically exhibits pride, elitism, and arrogance. However, when reality and failure eventually set in, the result is the person experiences spiritual burnout, or even shipwreck of his faith. Those who fail in their efforts are labeled as apostates, weak, or some other such term so that they can be discarded by the system.

#5) Unbalanced

Abusive religions must distinguish themselves from all other religions so they can claim to be distinctive and therefore special to God. This is usually done by majoring on minor issues such as prophecy, carrying biblical law to extremes, or using strange methods of biblical interpretation. The imbalanced spiritual hobby-horse thus produced represents unique knowledge or practices which seem to validate the group's claim to special status with God.

BIBLICAL RESPONSE

Examples of spiritual abuse are found throughout the Bible. God describes (and condemns) the "shepherds of Israel" who feed themselves rather than the flock, who do not heal those who are hurting, or seek to bring back those who were driven away but rather discard them, ruling with force and cruelty (Ezekiel 34:1-10). Jesus reacted with anger against the thievery of the money changers in the Temple as they misused God's people for selfish reasons (Matthew 21:12-13; Mark 11:15-18; Luke 19:45-47; John 2:13-16). He was angry at those more concerned with rules and regulations than with human suffering (Mark 3:1-5). In Matthew 23, Jesus describes the abusive spiritual leader in great detail. In John 9 the Pharisees "cast out" the man born blind simply because the truth he told about his healing exposed their own corruption. In Acts 7:51-56, Stephen called the Jewish leaders to account over their spiritual abuse. His testimony of Christ vindicated Jesus, whom they had abused, and condemned them. The legalistic Jews were so angry they stoned Stephen to death. In Galatians Paul addressed a performance based Christianity which leads to the abuse of legalism. There are many more such examples.

As God in human flesh, Jesus had legitimate spiritual authority. But He did not exercise it to gain power for Himself, or to abuse and control others with rules and regulations. He said, "Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden and I will give you rest" (Matt. 11:28). The Greek word for "heavy laden" is phortizo which means here "to overburden with ceremony (or spiritual anxiety)" (Strong's Concordance #5412). Jesus gave a balanced perspective on positional authority when he said, "But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren" (Matthew 23:8). He gave another key to discernment when He taught, "He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory..." (John 7:18a).

Jesus was not "image conscious." He was willing to associate with wine drinkers, cheating tax collectors and even prostitutes. He accused the legalistic Pharisees of "teaching for doctrine the commandments of men" (Matthew 15:9) and likened their showy, hypocritical outward rightousness to "whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness" (Matthew 23:27).

Neither was He paranoid. His ministry was conspicuously open to the public. When He was on trial (John 18) He was asked about His teachings and His reply was, "Why askest thou me?" Jesus pointed out that He always taught in public, and never in secret, so why not ask His disciples. He had nothing to hide.

Jesus did not fear to criticize the religious leaders or their faulty doctrines (e.g. Matthew 15:1-9; 23:1-39, etc.). And when confronted with criticism or with treacherous questions designed to discredit Him, His response was never to simply demand silence or only positive recognition from His accusers. Rather, He gave answers - scriptural and reasonable answers - to their objections (e.g. Luke 7:36-47; Matthew 19:3-9).

Jesus upheld the high standard of the Law, yet He clearly placed the legitimate needs of people before any rules or regulations (Matthew 12:1-13; Mark 2:23-3:5). The scriptures make it clear that no one will cease to sin in this life (Ecclesiastes 7:20; 1 John 1:8). Jesus made it plain, however, that one can know in this life that one has eternal life (John 5:24; 6:37-40), a theme developed by Paul throughout his epistles, and by John (1 John 5:10-13).

The Pharisees, quintessential spiritually abusive leaders, were quite unbalanced in their perception of what mattered most to God. Jesus said they, "...pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, - judgment, mercy, and faith...." (Matthew 23:23).

EFFECTS OF SPIRITUAL ABUSE

Spiritual abuse has a devastating effect on people. A very high level of trust is often placed in spiritual leaders. It is, and ought to be, expected that the trust will be honored and guarded. When such trust is violated the wound is very deep. Sometimes the wound is so deep that the wounded person cannot trust even a legitimate spiritual authority again.

An analogous situation exists with the victims of incest. The emotional and psychological symptoms exhibited by victims of incest parallel those of spiritual abuse to a remarkable degree. The main symptom is the inability to relate normally to people who represent the source of their emotional injury.

Besides an unhealthy fear of, and disillusionment with, spiritual authorities, the spiritually abused person may find it difficult to trust even God. "How could (or why did) He let this happen to me?" Anger is also deeply felt. Anger itself is not always wrong - God Himself expresses anger at such spiritual abuse (see Biblical Response, above). However, even legitimate anger, if not properly channeled and dealt with, can degenerate into bitterness and cynicism toward everything spiritual.

RECOVERY FROM SPIRITUAL ABUSE

Healthy recovery from spiritual abuse must begin with understanding what has happened and how. A victim usually thinks he is the only one experiencing these problems. Just being able to give a name to the problem is important. There are many books on the subject (see Resources, below) that will be helpful in learning about spiritual abuse and recovery.

Afterward the abused person must learn the true nature of God's grace, love and forgiveness. This is the foundation for being able to eventually forgive the abuser. Being able to share the experience and what has been learned so as to minister to someone else's need is also very important. This could be done in a support group made up of people with a similar experience who can share the healing love of Christ.

Finally, a lot of time must be allowed for full recovery.

Signs of Spiritual Abuse

SignsofSpiritualAbuse

Leader(s), including some members, rely upon unspoken rules, traditions, or customs which are primarily communicated through a variety of negative means in order to shape behaviors into patterns deemed acceptable by the group. Breaking the unspoken rules of the group violates their hidden, secret agendas and results in any or all of the following responses, all of which are designed to both discourage infractions and protect the perpetrator(s) of the abuse:

  • the shutting off of positive responses (smiles, small talk, encouraging words) towards the individual in question
  • silent expessions of disapproval
  • adopting a negative ‘air’ with a person by manifesting a pervasive feeling of displeasure toward the individual
  • restricting a person from various aspects of fellowship with the group, especially excluding the individual from the oppurtunity to socialize or work with favored members of the group  
    • they value the unity of the faith and strongly desire the fellowship of other believers
    • they will endure suffering, forgive easily, and wait patiently for God’s redemptive power to restore relationships, heal wounds, and correct doctrine
    • the abuser becomes addicted to the false sense of security and affirmation he or she receives from wielding the power of control over a compliant victim
    • and the victim, devalued and humiliated by the abuse, becomes addicted to the strong affirmations of personal approval which the abuser occassionally provides as a reward for continued submission
  • This type of behavioral control is especially effective with two kinds of people:

    1) temporarily, with those possessing a strong, personal committment to Christ because:

    2) long-term in those who are so wounded that their only joy comes from abusing others but who lack the power to abuse without the support of a stronger, more powerful, and manipulative abuser willing to empower them.  In fact, what some refer to as an illicit co-dependency can develop over time between the abuser and the abused because:

Characteristics of Abusive Churches

  • leader(s) make public pronouncements to emphasize that they are person(s) of greater authority than others in the church, relying upon their position, title, or function to serve as the basis of that claim 
  • leader(s) attempt to compel people to do things rather than appeal to their conscience with truth and trust God to lead them
  • leader(s) place burdens upon the people beyond that which God requires by condemning actions which scripture does not prohibit and which God leaves to the discretion of the individual worshipper
  • an emphasis upon what believers do or don’t do (a ‘works’ mentality) or a focus upon corporate performance (often referred to as ‘a spirit of excellence’) rather than upon who Christ is, what He has done, and the need for man’s continued repentance
  • pleas for money are common and emotional
  • leader(s) function as lords, rather than servants
  • the church is stamped with a personality other than Christ
  • a gross emphasis upon God’s power and the need for supernatural experiences (especially during church services) rather than upon God’s character and the need to demonstrate our faith daily in simple, natural ways
  • resistance to or a flat denial of the active ministry of the Holy Spirit in the life of the believer
  • ‘spiritual correction’ is wielded as a tool of humiliation
  • an air of secrecy is cultivated by leader(s)
  • wrong-doing is tolerated rather than confronted, especially when the transgressors are leaders in the church--leader(s) will not apologize and do not demonstrate remorse for wrong-doing (hurtful words or inappropriate actions)--there is no concern for justice
  • the unspoken (or spoken) conviction that those in the abusive system are in some way spiritually superior to those without the group
  • leader(s) desire to have knowledge of intimate details of their members lives, especially their sins
  • leader(s) hold themselves up as ‘special’ earpieces and mouthpieces of God rather than ordinary believers who God sometimes uses in extraordinary ways
  • loyalty to the person or group is ‘the unspoken agenda’ emphasized above loyalty to Christ
  • leader(s) encourage members to remain isolated from other churches and outside fellowship: this is often expressed to individuals indirectly by appealing to their emotion and stressing the group’s need for members to attend every service or meeting in order to help the group achieve a common goal
  • leader(s) desire to wield control over various aspects of member’s lives
  • leader(s) seem oblivious to the pain of those they wound
  • some members are deemed more important than others
  • the institution of ‘church’ always takes precedence over family worship times and scripturally supported community interaction
  • individuals are encouraged to participate in programs and follow a distinct personality, rather than discover their calling
  • the composition of the assembly does not mirror the cultural and ethnic composition of the community to the extent possible   
  • participating/serving in church activities and ministries is an obligation one is expected to fulfill because there is an emphasis upon seeing the institution of church succeed rather than upon teaching people how to incorporate their faith into every daily aspect of their lives; there is a greater concern for the institution, its activities, and customs than there is for the people it professes to serve
  • while faults are admitted, leader(s) rarely appear to struggle, be weak, or demonstrate imperfections because they work hard to subdue such impressions through the use and force of their personal will
  • ministry programs of the church (run by leader(s) who tell members what to do, how to do it, and when) are emphasized more than personal minstry
  • people feel controlled rather than supported
  • leader(s) are surrounded by elders who refuse to disagree with them as a rule or who only disagree with leader(s) in areas which are deemed open to challenge; leader(s) desire members of the group to follow him or her without question
  • the congregation is trained to be obedient to man (designated leaders) rather than God
  • questioning the actions of any leader (on the basis of scripture) is either not encouraged or such challenges are met with condemnation, resistance, and irritation
  • leader(s) do not respond to scriptural questions and challenges with scripture, or do so, but not within the context of a multitude of counselors or elders
  • personal relationship with God is weakened, rather than strengthened, by association with the group, or the most intimate and important aspects of an individual’s private worship and walk with God are constantly being called into question by leader(s)
Leaders are above correction, so wrongs continue rather than being confronted and eliminated; at best, wrongs simply change forms (and become hidden).